22 November 2002Like a hot potato, distribution costs are being
tossed around from airlines to agents to consumers.
American Airlines now wants agents to pick up the tab for
being allowed to book web fares through the GDS. It may be
a ploy to circumvent competition issues in the US, but it
may also be the start of an attempt to move all GDS fees to
the agents. Qantas meanwhile is urging agents to help
airlines cut GDS fees by practising good GDS
behaviour.
American Airlines stirred up the industry in the US late
September by launching a new programme allowing travel
agents to book its web fares.
Having access to the web fares through the GDS was not
the issue - it was something the agents had wanted for a
while. The issue was that agents participating in the the
"EveryFare" programme had to pick up the tab for the GDS
booking fee. To make the bitter pill go down a little
easier, American sugar-coated it by providing participating
agencies with allowance credits to partially cover GDS
fees.
Those allowances, initially set at US$4.13 per flight
coupon, will gradually diminish over the next five years.
In return, participating agencies compensate AA with an
amount equal to the fees paid to their GDS of choice.
Before this, American's web fares were only available on
the carrier's website and through certain lower-cost online
channels, notably Orbitz and Travelocity.
AA said it set a schedule of gradually declining agency
allowances to enable participants to secure lower GDS fees
and realise efficiencies from new distribution
technologies.
"We are saying to travel agencies, this is our cost of
distribution through Orbitz," American's CEO and chairman
Don Carty said. "If you want access to the same inventory
as Orbitz, these are the costs to manage."
He added that agency access to web fares nullifies
competition-related complaints lodged against Orbitz.
American has been vocal in the press about its intentions:
to cut down its GDS fees which cost American US$400 million
last year. Through this programme, American expects to
halve its GDS fees in five years.
It also said it will eventually have agents book these
web fares through its own website at aa.com, thereby
bypassing the GDS completely.
A week later, Northwest Airlines also made announcements
that its web fares will be available to travel agents.
Unlike American, it launched an Internet site for agents,
in which they would have free and unrestricted access to
its web fares, enjoy simplified reporting, complete online
booking capabilities and others.
"Northwest's WorldAgent Direct site will make doing
business with the airline free and easy for travel
professionals," said Fay Beauchine, vice president of sales
and customer relations.
"WorldAgent Direct, designed with the help of travel
agents, will be second to none in the array of products and
services it offers, from fully integrated reporting to
end-to-end support of the customer experience."
It is clear the focus of airlines is to zero in on
distribution costs and GDS fees have again come into the
limelight.
A recent study backed by Orbitz reported that airline
fees paid to GDS will total US$2.2 billion this year. It
found GDSs continue to generate "significant profit
margins, despite losses by air carriers and increasing cost
pressures on travel agencies".
A United spokesman confirmed these findings with its own
evidence. "Last year alone, we spent US$300 million on GDS
booking fees and the costs continue to increase. These fees
have gone up over 350 percent for United over the past 20
years. By comparison, during this same 20 year period,
United's average domestic revenue per enplaned passenger
has increased less than 14 percent," he said.
While United, one of the world's largest carriers,
maintains travel agents account for more than 70 percent of
its revenue, the airline made it clear that this channel is
also its most expensive.
"It is an indisputable fact that these same traditional
travel agents, because of high GDS fees, represent our most
expensive distribution channel. The average GDS booking fee
was less than US$1 per segment in the early 1980s. United
is estimating that the fees for 2002 will be over US$4.50
per booking. This is at a time when the costs associated
with data processing activities in other industries have
declined tremendously, he added.
The Orbitz study's conclusion? That growing consumer
demand for lower air fares - caused in part by the
evolution of the Internet - "is compelling airlines to
embrace new technology and find innovative alternatives to
lower their distribution costs."
American and Northwest's move are in sync with the
study's conclusions.
An industry observer suggested to TravelWeekly
that American's move is only a temporary solution that
makes use of current distribution technologies - namely the
Internet.
"It is likely developing a process that will move all
GDS fees to the agents - not just those for Internet fares,
but for all fares."
He also asked, "If there was an Internet infrastructure
20 years ago, would there have been any GDS created?
Probably not.
"The GDSs will have to make themselves relevant today -
being a very powerful complier of products," he said.
While the Internet has presented itself to airlines as
another effective distribution channel, the GDSs are
finding the Internet has caused other problems.
For one, GDSs are not meant for bulk usage, but by
creating open links with web retailers to its system, the
GDSs are finding the volume of usage has hit record
highs.
"They must then decide if they want to pump in more
capital to bulk up their servers to take in public hits.
But to do so would require a lot of money - who will pay
for that? And these hits are often not translated into
actual bookings and hence, may not generate any segment
fees for the GDSs," he said.
In the US, GDSs are also being affected by the increase
in domestic travel as opposed to international travel. Most
of the domestic travel is done on low cost carriers that do
not depend on GDSs. On top of that, more major carriers are
going direct to the consumers and bypassing the GDS.
"The airlines have created a monster that it is now
trying to eliminate. GDSs, on the other hand, must
diversify and find other revenue streams so as not to
squeeze its traditional suppliers - namely the airlines,"
he said.
Meanwhile, Worldspan is working on a new pricing
strategy to replace the current model "that is broken",
according to the Atlanta-based GDS. It has said that the
current model is "unfair" to the suppliers.