SPECIAL
REPORT: BATTLE OF THE HUBS
Singapore Airlines and the island-nation's Changi airport
have been warned to shave costs by up to 15 percent to
remain on top in an increasingly competitive aviation
industry.
The wake-up call came from Singapore senior minister Lee
Kuan Yew, who cited the growing reputations of Bangkok and
Dubai as aviation hubs, the rapidly expanding budget
airline industry and rival carrier Emirates as threats to
Singapore.
Why the concern? For a start, there's the new generation of
longer-range aircraft which can overfly Singapore. "Now,
travellers can fly London-Dubai-Sydney or
London-Bangkok-Sydney and save a hundred miles.
"And Bangkok is better placed than Singapore to serve Asian
destinations to the north, such as Vietnam," Lee
said.
And it's not just Bangkok, with its new airport due this
year, and Dubai that are shaping up as major rivals to
Singapore. Hong Kong International Airport at Chek Lap Kok
is pursuing an aggressive expansion policy, and aligning
air, sea and road transport to caputure the huge market to
and from maniland China.
"So sit down, weigh the odds and say, 'How are we placed?'.
I think we are disadvantaged. How do we overcome that
disadvantage? That's the nub of the problem," Lee
said.
TravelWeekly has
sought the opinion of two experts in the field on how
Singapore and Dubai are shaping up with their airports and
airlines.
Mac Patel, aviation
consultant from the Travel Consulting Group, and Peter
Miller, head of research at London-based Skytrax Research,
whose airline and airport ratings are frequently quoted by
the leading airlines, offer their views.MAC
PATEL
Hub
Development
Both Singapore and Dubai governments have pursued an Open
Skies policy to further develop their hubs. As a result of
Emirates' aggressive expansion plans, Singapore Airlines
has most to lose.
For example, Emirates is already flying non-stop from
Sydney to Dubai, thereby cutting out Singapore as a transit
stopover point and providing a faster and convenient
routing to Europe with one-stop service rather than two
stops.
This is possible thanks to the ultra-long haul aircraft,
such as the Airbus A340-500s, which have become an aircraft
of choice for airlines wishing to provide "ultra longhaul,
nonstop point-to-point services" (i.e Sydney to Dubai and
Singapore to Los Angeles).
Emirates' strategy of creating Dubai International Airport
as a hub makes sense in that it allows the carrier to fly
passengers from the Asia Pacific region into Dubai and
provide connections to primary and secondary destinations
in UK/Europe.
For example, if a traveller wants to fly from Sydney to
Birmingham, he or she would take the nonstop Sydney to
Dubai flight and then connect onwards from Dubai to
Birmingham.
This omits the necessary transfers at busy airports such as
London Heathrow where congestion can often result in
lenghty delays and inconvenient transfers between
terminals.
Given Dubai's strategic location and visionary government,
coupled with
technological advances in aircraft manufacturing, Emirates
has flourished faster than anyone, including Singapore, had
anticipated.
Low-Cost
Airlines
Dubai is fast emerging as the 21st Century global airline
hub, while Singapore is faced with an increased challenge
from the rapid emergence of low-cost airlines in the
South-East Asian corridor.
The Singapore government has had very little choice but to
find a quick solution to the problem of a high operating
cost structure at the airport. Proposals have included
building a dedicated passenger terminal at Changi Airport
for use by low-cost carriers, at least two of which are due
to be launched in the city state mid-2004.
The low-cost airline terminal would provide limited
amenities and passenger service charges would be lower.
Meeting the
Challenge
Singapore Airlines recently announced that it would launch
a low-fare carrier called Tiger Airways in the second half
of 2004 in partnership with investors from the USA and
Europe.
Another new Singapore-based airline, ValuAir, is meanwhile
planning to launch services in the first half of 2004,
while Malaysian low-fare carrier AirAsia has looked at
serving Changi while also considering starting an associate
airline in Singapore with local partners.
AirAsia has said that Changi Airport's user charges are
currently too high to justify
operations.
Ownership
Emirates is owned 100 percent by the Government of Dubai
whereas Singapore Airlines Group is 56.76 percent owned by
the Singapore Government controlled company, Tamasek
Holdings (Private) Limited.
Frequent Flyer Programme
& Airline Alliance
Both airlines participate in each other's frequent flyer
programmes, however Emirates is still not convinced about
joining a major global alliance.
The SQ-EK relationship only goes as far as members being
able to "earn and burn miles" on each other carrier's
flights.
What is surprising is the fact that members of Singapore
Airlines' Krisflyer are not able to redeem their miles on
Emirates' Sydney/ Brisbane/Melbourne to Auckland services.
No one at Krisflyer service centre was able to explain why
this might be the case but one might assume that Air New
Zealand has put pressure on Singapore Airlines through the
Star Alliance management board to inhibit its participation
on these specific routes operated by Emirates.
With ongoing speculation about Emirates' alliance strategy,
the airline's president, Tim Clarke, has made it clear that
it's corporate strategy is to develop relationships based
on code-sharing agreements with various airlines, the most
recent being with Royal Air Maroc, Finnair and Continental
Airlines.
Network &
Growth
Emirates' biggest advantage is that it has a large network
in the UK/Europe (19 cities: Athens, Birmingham,
Dusseldorf, Frankfurt, Glasgow, Istanbul, Larnaca, London
Gatwick, London Heathrow, Malta, Manchester, Milan, Moscow,
Munich, Nice, Paris, Rome, Vienna and Zurich) compared to
Singapore Airlines network of 11 cities (Amsterdam, Athens,
Copenhagen, Frankfurt, Istanbul, London Heathrow, Madrid,
Manchester, Paris, Rome and Zurich).
What makes Emirates the biggest threat to other airlines in
the Asian region, particularly Singapore Airlines, is its
successful growth story.
In the period between 1998 to 2002, the airline has
increased its revenue passenger kilometres (RPK - a key
measure of an airline's passenger traffic) by 56.07 percent
compared to Singapore Airlines' growth of 18.71 percent for
the same corresponding period.
Service
Development
In terms of service, Emirates and Singapore Airlines ranked
2nd and 3rd places respectively in the Global Skytrax
Survey behind Cathay Pacific (1st place and Airline of the
Year 2003).
With the introduction of Emirates' new First Class product
on the Airbus A340-500 fleet, it has re-defined the
standards in First Class travel.
Fleet and Route
Development
In June 2003, Emirates placed the biggest aircraft order in
civil aviation history worth US$19 billion. The airline has
an order for 45 giant double-deck Airbus A380s, 26 Boeing
777-300ER and 20 Airbus A340-500/600s. The order book will
increase Emirates' fleet to 125 aircraft by 2012, as part
of long-term plans to serve many new countries.
The new jets will also boost flights on existing routes to
Australia, China, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Maldives,
Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore and Thailand.
On the other hand, Singapore Airlines' expansion plans are
not as ambitious as Emirates but the airline is adding the
ultra long-haul Airbus A340-500 to its fleet to service the
nonstop flights from Singapore to Los Angeles and New York.
The airline has began taking deliveries of the new Airbus
A340-500 with a further five aircraft placed on option. It
also has firm orders for 10 Airbus A380s with a further 15
placed on option.
Service
Quality
SIA has been "king of the castle" in terms of service
quality for many years, and has served as a benchmark
against which many other airlines measured
themselves.
But, like so many industries, staying ahead is a difficult
task to achieve. SIA, like so many Asian carriers - was for
many years able to exalt its service quality, based around
the efficiency, discipline and general finesse of the
Singapore girls (or boys).
As many airlines across Asia have found, the younger staff
joining the airline in recent years have a different
mindset to their elders - the general Westernisation, mass
impact of US TV and movies have all served to create a
younger generation with different values and attitudes
towards those around them.
Emirates is based on a multi-national staff, and although
they perform service at a reasonable level, they are not
achieving the service quality of their counterparts at SIA,
Cathay, MAS etc.
Product
Innovation
Emirates, like SIA, has developed itself around product
innovation, and was the first major carrier to offer
personal TV across all cabins, although it has fallen
behind in seat quality (especially in First /
Business).
Emirates is now commencing a product development programme.
The new A340-500 First Class from Emirates is without doubt
the world's finest, although its new Business class is not
up to the levels offered by SIA, Cathay, BA, Qantas
etc.
Battle of the Hubs
When it started, Emirates adopted the SIA policy that its
customers would be transiting through Dubai - the home
market in Dubai not being enough to sustain a globally
developing airline.
SIA did the same, and while Singapore was for many years a
popular transit
stopover, this is a market where Singapore now seems to
have lost popularity.
In contrast, Dubai has invested billions in the home
tourism market, and Emirates now enjoys the best of both
worlds - transit traffic through Dubai and point to point
business for tourists to Dubai.
Changi has been one of the world's best airports for nearly
20 years, and similarly served as a benchmark against which
other airports measured standards. Even today, Hong Kong
and Kuala Lumpur have brand new airports, but Changi is
able to offer a broader and more innovative selection of
products and services to the passenger - this is why Changi
is currently the only five-star airport.
Dubai built its airport several years ago, and while a
great improvement on the old buildings, it is not at the
level offered by Changi or Hong Kong. For a relatively
short transfer it is okay, but you really do not want more
than two to three hours in DXB before getting bored and
finding the facilities lacking. Changi can offer much
more.
SIA versus
Emirates
Comparing the two airlines, SIA has suffered greatly
through the SARS crisis, and this served to highlight that
SIA management and day-to-day running costs were too high
to achieve the required profitability.
Like the sudden realisation at BA that they were grossly
overstaffed, SIA is now beginning to realise that the
company needs to be much leaner and fitter if it is to
provide real commercial growth and profitability.
Emirates, as a newer airline, has always been able to
control its cost base more effectively than SIA, despite
critics saying otherwise.
Emirates is now a very profitable airline. Virtually every
single flight is full.
This does have some side effects; when travelling in First
or Business class with Emirates you will often find
yourself surrounded by upgraded passengers -
nevertheless, it ensures that no revenue opportunities are
missed.
Emirates has never opened routes on political grounds, with
all expansion based upon pure commercial sense - will it
make money?
Emirates also has some of the best marketing know-how in
the industry, and its
name and reputation is pretty well known across
Asia/Pacific, Africa, Europe and some parts of North
America.
Its massive sponsorship of sport is a sure way of
establishing its name among the future travelling public.
Rather than modelling a glossy image around the SIA girl
format, they simply push out to market the name:
Emirates.
PETER
MILLER
Hub
Development
Both Singapore and Dubai governments have pursued an
Open Skies policy to further develop their hubs. As a
result of Emirates' aggressive expansion plans, Singapore
Airlines has most to lose.
For example, Emirates is already flying non-stop from
Sydney to Dubai, thereby cutting out Singapore as a transit
stopover point and providing a faster and convenient
routing to Europe with one-stop service rather than two
stops.
This is possible thanks to the ultra-long haul aircraft,
such as the Airbus A340-500s, which have become an aircraft
of choice for airlines wishing to provide "ultra longhaul,
nonstop point-to-point services" (i.e Sydney to Dubai and
Singapore to Los Angeles).
Emirates' strategy of creating Dubai International Airport
as a hub makes sense in that it allows the carrier to fly
passengers from the Asia Pacific region into Dubai and
provide connections to primary and secondary destinations
in UK/Europe.
For example, if a traveller wants to fly from Sydney to
Birmingham, he or she would take the nonstop Sydney to
Dubai flight and then connect onwards from Dubai to
Birmingham.
This omits the necessary transfers at busy airports such as
London Heathrow where congestion can often result in
lenghty delays and inconvenient transfers between
terminals.
Given Dubai's strategic location and visionary government,
coupled with
technological advances in aircraft manufacturing, Emirates
has flourished faster than anyone, including Singapore, had
anticipated.
Low-Cost
Airlines
Dubai is fast emerging as the 21st Century global airline
hub, while Singapore is faced with an increased challenge
from the rapid emergence of low-cost airlines in the
South-East Asian corridor.
The Singapore government has had very little choice but to
find a quick solution to the problem of a high operating
cost structure at the airport. Proposals have included
building a dedicated passenger terminal at Changi Airport
for use by low-cost carriers, at least two of which are due
to be launched in the city state mid-2004.
The low-cost airline terminal would provide limited
amenities and passenger service charges would be lower.
Meeting the
Challenge
Singapore Airlines recently announced that it would launch
a low-fare carrier called Tiger Airways in the second half
of 2004 in partnership with investors from the USA and
Europe.
Another new Singapore-based airline, ValuAir, is meanwhile
planning to launch services in the first half of 2004,
while Malaysian low-fare carrier AirAsia has looked at
serving Changi while also considering starting an associate
airline in Singapore with local partners.
AirAsia has said that Changi Airport's user charges are
currently too high to justify
operations.
Ownership
Emirates is owned 100 percent by the Government of Dubai
whereas Singapore Airlines Group is 56.76 percent owned by
the Singapore Government controlled company, Temasek
Holdings (Private) Limited.
Frequent Flyer Programme
& Airline Alliance
Both airlines participate in each other's frequent flyer
programmes, however Emirates is still not convinced about
joining a major global alliance.
The SQ-EK relationship only goes as far as members being
able to "earn and burn miles" on each other carrier's
flights.
What is surprising is the fact that members of Singapore
Airlines' Krisflyer are not able to redeem their miles on
Emirates' Sydney/ Brisbane/Melbourne to Auckland services.
No one at Krisflyer service centre was able to explain why
this might be the case but one might assume that Air New
Zealand has put pressure on Singapore Airlines through the
Star Alliance management board to inhibit its participation
on these specific routes operated by Emirates.
With ongoing speculation about Emirates' alliance strategy,
the airline's president, Tim Clarke, has made it clear that
it's corporate strategy is to develop relationships based
on code-sharing agreements with various airlines, the most
recent being with Royal Air Maroc, Finnair and Continental
Airlines.
Network &
Growth
Emirates' biggest advantage is that it has a large network
in the UK/Europe (19 cities: Athens, Birmingham,
Dusseldorf, Frankfurt, Glasgow, Istanbul, Larnaca, London
Gatwick, London Heathrow, Malta, Manchester, Milan, Moscow,
Munich, Nice, Paris, Rome, Vienna and Zurich) compared to
Singapore Airlines network of 11 cities (Amsterdam, Athens,
Copenhagen, Frankfurt, Istanbul, London Heathrow, Madrid,
Manchester, Paris, Rome and Zurich).
What makes Emirates the biggest threat to other airlines in
the Asian region, particularly Singapore Airlines, is its
successful growth story.
In the period between 1998 to 2002, the airline has
increased its revenue passenger kilometres (RPK - a key
measure of an airline's passenger traffic) by 56.07 percent
compared to Singapore Airlines' growth of 18.71 percent for
the same corresponding period.
Service
Development
In terms of service, Emirates and Singapore Airlines ranked
2nd and 3rd places respectively in the Global Skytrax
Survey behind Cathay Pacific (1st place and Airline of the
Year 2003).
With the introduction of Emirates' new First Class product
on the Airbus A340-500 fleet, it has re-defined the
standards in First Class travel.
Fleet and Route
Development
In June 2003, Emirates placed the biggest aircraft order in
civil aviation history worth US$19 billion. The airline has
an order for 45 giant double-deck Airbus A380s, 26 Boeing
777-300ER and 20 Airbus A340-500/600s. The order book will
increase Emirates' fleet to 125 aircraft by 2012, as part
of long-term plans to serve many new countries.
The new jets will also boost flights on existing routes to
Australia, China, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Maldives,
Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore and Thailand.
On the other hand, Singapore Airlines' expansion plans are
not as ambitious as Emirates but the airline is adding the
ultra long-haul Airbus A340-500 to its fleet to service the
nonstop flights from Singapore to Los Angeles and New York.
The airline has began taking deliveries of the new Airbus
A340-500 with a further five aircraft placed on option. It
also has firm orders for 10 Airbus A380s with a further 15
placed on option.
Service
Quality
SIA has been "king of the castle" in terms of service
quality for many years, and has served as a benchmark
against which many other airlines measured
themselves.
But, like so many industries, staying ahead is a difficult
task to achieve. SIA, like so many Asian carriers - was for
many years able to exalt its service quality, based around
the efficiency, discipline and general finesse of the
Singapore girls (or boys).
As many airlines across Asia have found, the younger staff
joining the airline in recent years have a different
mindset to their elders - the general Westernisation, mass
impact of US TV and movies have all served to create a
younger generation with different values and attitudes
towards those around them.
Emirates is based on a multi-national staff, and although
they perform service at a reasonable level, they are not
achieving the service quality of their counterparts at SIA,
Cathay, MAS etc.
Product
Innovation
Emirates, like SIA, has developed itself around product
innovation, and was the first major carrier to offer
personal TV across all cabins, although it has fallen
behind in seat quality (especially in First /
Business).
Emirates is now commencing a product development programme.
The new A340-500 First Class from Emirates is without doubt
the world's finest, although its new Business class is not
up to the levels offered by SIA, Cathay, BA, Qantas
etc.
Battle of the
Hubs
When it started, Emirates adopted the SIA policy that its
customers would be transiting through Dubai - the home
market in Dubai not being enough to sustain a globally
developing airline.
SIA did the same, and while Singapore was for many years a
popular transit stopover, this is a market where Singapore
now seems to have lost popularity.
In contrast, Dubai has invested billions in the home
tourism market, and Emirates now enjoys the best of both
worlds - transit traffic through Dubai and point to point
business for tourists to Dubai.
Changi has been one of the world's best airports for nearly
20 years, and similarly served as a benchmark against which
other airports measured standards. Even today, Hong Kong
and Kuala Lumpur have brand new airports, but Changi is
able to offer a broader and more innovative selection of
products and services to the passenger - this is why Changi
is currently the only five-star airport.
Dubai built its airport several years ago, and while a
great improvement on the old buildings, it is not at the
level offered by Changi or Hong Kong. For a relatively
short transfer it is okay, but you really do not want more
than two to three hours in DXB before getting bored and
finding the facilities lacking. Changi can offer much
more.
SIA versus
Emirates
Comparing the two airlines, SIA has suffered greatly
through the SARS crisis, and this served to highlight that
SIA management and day-to-day running costs were too high
to achieve the required profitability.
Like the sudden realisation at BA that they were grossly
overstaffed, SIA is now beginning to realise that the
company needs to be much leaner and fitter if it is to
provide real commercial growth and profitability.
Emirates, as a newer airline, has always been able to
control its cost base more effectively than SIA, despite
critics saying otherwise.
Emirates is now a very profitable airline. Virtually every
single flight is full.
This does have some side effects; when travelling in First
or Business class with Emirates you will often find
yourself surrounded by upgraded passengers -
nevertheless, it ensures that no revenue opportunities are
missed.
Emirates has never opened routes on political grounds, with
all expansion based upon pure commercial sense - will it
make money?
Emirates also has some of the best marketing know-how in
the industry, and its name and reputation is pretty well
known across Asia/Pacific, Africa, Europe and some parts of
North America.
Its massive sponsorship of sport is a sure way of
establishing its name among the future travelling public.
Rather than modelling a glossy image around the SIA girl
format, they simply push out to market the name:
Emirates.